Parents Chose Prayer Over Hospital and Ended Up Convicted for Their Baby’s Death

Blair and Taylor Edwards: Parents Relied Only on Faith

Baby Died from Lack of Medical Care

Conviction Exposes Religious Limits

A recent case in Oregon has placed under scrutiny the thin line between religious faith and the legal duty of parents to protect their children’s lives.

Blair and Taylor Edwards, aged 37 and 32, chose to face their newborn’s illness solely with prayers and olive oil, disregarding medical care that could have given him a real chance of survival.

The baby, named Hayden, was born in June 2023 and began showing worrying signs just two days later.

According to the prosecution, he stopped feeding and developed a pale bluish tone, a clear indication that he urgently needed medical attention.

Instead of taking him to a hospital, his parents turned to practices dictated by their religious beliefs.

Blair and Taylor Edwards Face Legal Consequences for Their Son’s Death

Blair and Taylor Edwards Convicted for Their Baby’s Death – PHOTO: YouTube capture. KWG News video still

What the Prosecution Said

During the trial, Deputy District Attorney Russell Amos described the couple’s motivations:

“They hoped that within God’s hands, he would be fine.”

That statement became the centerpiece of the debate over whether the parents acted negligently by prioritizing their faith over their baby’s health.

The medical examiner’s report revealed that Hayden was suffering from acute bilirubin encephalopathy, a consequence of jaundice.

This condition, had he received immediate medical treatment, was treatable with a “very, very high probability” of success.

The most harrowing part of the testimony was the portrayal of the family’s inaction.

The coroner himself declared:

“That child was surrounded by people who loved him very much, but those same people sat for more than five hours doing nothing to help him.”

New Details From the Investigation into the Baby’s Death

Reports from the Clackamas County Sheriff’s Office revealed that Taylor Edwards gave birth at home, without complications and without medical assistance.

They also confirmed that the baby had not received any vaccines.

According to the documents, Taylor stated that the baby appeared healthy until June 24, when he began breathing in short gasps for several hours.

Detective Matt Messina noted an “open bottle of olive oil” on the mother’s nightstand, an item used by members of the church to anoint the sick or dying.

Blair Edwards admitted to putting oil on his son’s chest to anoint him, but added only:

“I used it and that’s all I’m going to say.”

Messina also asked the family if there were any circumstances under which they would consider calling medical services, but Blair Edwards avoided answering.

The detective further highlighted the striking claim by the couple and their relatives that they were unaware of a previous high-profile case connected to the same church.

In 2017, members Sarah and Travis Mitchell were sentenced to prison after the death of their daughter Ginnifer, a premature baby who died of acute respiratory distress syndrome, after the parents admitted they had not sought medical attention.

The Sentence and Imposed Conditions

The court found Blair and Taylor Edwards guilty of first-degree criminal mistreatment.

As a result, they were sentenced to serve 30 days in jail.

But the sanction did not stop there: the court also imposed a series of strict conditions to ensure the welfare of their other children.

Among them, they must take the children regularly to a pediatrician, maintain active health insurance, and notify their probation officer of any accident or illness.

The measure seeks to prevent another child in the family from being exposed to decisions based solely on religious beliefs without medical support.

TE PUEDE INTERESAR: 5-Year-Old Boy Dies After Taking Expired Paracetamol in Cuba

This case opens a debate that goes beyond Oregon:

How far does religious freedom go when a child’s life is at stake?

The sentence sends a clear message that faith does not exempt parents from the legal responsibility to protect their children’s health.

Do you think courts should be stricter with parents who prioritize faith over their children’s medical care?

SOURCE: Oregon Live «The Oregonian»